Archive for the ‘Editorial’ Category


January 6, 2017

This is the Senegalese lawyer bidding for contract to defend Jammeh at the ICC

Maitre El Hadj Diouf of Senegal is a relatively obscure name to many Gambians, despite his notoriety in Senegal for his many controversies. May be due to his name being overshadowed by his shared namesake El-hadji Diouf the footballer. However, due to his recent rants about the current Gambian political impasse, he has attracted himself some unwanted Gambian attention, as he tries to appropriate the narrative of the Gambian political impasse with little knowledge of the key facts. 

Appearing on TFM TV program on 5 January 2017, Maitre Diouf, a veteran lawyer in Senegal, feigned professorial understanding of the current Gambian political impasse, Gambian judicial system and Gambian constitution, yet he exposed his very little knowledge of what is actually happening in The Gambia.

Firstly; he claimed that only provisional Electoral results of the 1 December 2016 Presidential elections were announced on 2 December 2016, when Yahya Jammeh conceded defeat to President Elect Adama Barrow. He added that those results were provisional results and not final. For that reason, according him, Jammeh’s concession means nothing, as it relates to only the Provisional results, which were not final at the time.

Secondly; he claimed that the Gambia’s Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) admitted to stealing or rigging of votes from Jammeh to Barrow, which was the mistakes announced by the IEC Chairman, Alieu Momar Njie on 5 December 2016. He said it is the electoral commission who cause the whole impasse and not Yahya Jammeh. He branded the two Electoral result papers issued by the IEC for the 2 December 2016 and 5 December 2016 as his evidence of the incompetence of the IEC and their rigging of votes from Jammeh to Barrow.

Thirdly, he claimed that there is a constituted Supreme Court in The Gambia and those claiming that no such constituted Supreme Court exist in The Gambia are spreading false information. He further challenged those that contended that an all Nigerian Supreme Court Judges decision should not be accepted, as they are all foreigners.

Fifthly and finally, Maitre Diouf claimed that he knows the Gambia very well and has extended family there. He claimed he is motivated to take position in the impasse due to his love and care for the Gambian people and love for justice. For this reason, he is setting up a coalition in Senegal with musician Ouza against, any ECOWAS intervention in The Gambia.

It is based on the above succinct synopses, Maitre Diouf wishes to appropriate or take charge of the narrative of the current Gambian political impasse as his, without checking the veracity of his facts about the true picture of issues at play in the Gambian political impasse.

With regards to his first claim, Maitre Diouf’s notion of provisional results and final result is completely misplaced, as the Gambia does not have Provisional and Final results system. Therefore, the results announced on 2 December 2016 was the official final results and not provisional results. This was the final results, President Jammeh accepted on 2 December 2016 to be free and fair! And President Jammeh was indeed right on that first occasion, as the Presidential elections of 1 December 2016 was generally viewed by many as the first free and fair elections in the Gambia. This is attributed to the fact that this was the first election, when the votes were counted at the same spot where the voting took place.

As a result, the ballots were never moved from one place to another, during which, the oppositions had in the past complained about ballot boxes being switched with pre-filled boxes for President Jammeh, by his security forces in charge of the transiting of the ballot boxes. This year that could not happen, allaying any such opportunity for rigging or suspicion. Instead votes were counted at where the voting took place and witnessed by all those who voted at that particular voting place.

Furthermore, there were no reports of any complaints or disturbances at any of the voting and counting places, as counting was done peacefully and all those, who witnessed the counting at the various parts of the country, accepted the results. The counted results were further certified by IEC polling officials and political party agents, before those results are forwarded to the IEC Headquarters for the IEC Chairman to make the announcements.

At the same time, political party agents were also sending the same results to their respective party Headquarters for their own party tallying of the results. Therefore by the time, the last results were announced by the IEC Chairman, on 2 December 2016, it was clear to Jammeh and his party that they had lost the election, because his party agents would have told them about the results of their various locations. If there were any issues with the results, the party agents would have also told the same to Jammeh. Therefore, Jammeh accepted the elections results not because of the IEC’s mistake, but because his own party agents reported no irregularities to him and from their witnessed results, he lost the elections fair and square.

The corrections announced by the IEC on 5 December 2016 related to the correction of the final totalling of the national results, which they made an error after double entering the results for the Basse region twice for each of parties in the national results. Thereby increasing the final national results of each of the parties by about 20,000 more votes. They corrected this mistake by simply deducting the additional increment from each of the parties’ total national results, to get to the accurate final figure, which would have corresponded with the final tally of each of the parties.

From this narration, it is clear that Matitre Diouf’s claims that, the IEC had rigged the ballots in favour of the opposition is quite simply unfounded, as such is impossible without Jammeh knowing about it before his concession speech of 2 December 2016. Secondly, Maitre Diouf failed to appreciate the fact that, in the Gambia under Jammeh, with the level of his grip on power and the level of fear he instilled in Gambians, it would be suicidal or almost impossible for anyone to contemplate on cheating Jammeh! Therefore, the veteran Senegalese lawyer should have verified his facts first before bragging his expertise in a subject, where he has zero knowledge.

With regards to the Supreme Court, Maitre Diouf disputed the claims that there is only one Judge at the Supreme Court, being the Chief Justice, Emannuel Fagbenle; but failed to mention the names of the other Supreme Court Judges currently in the Gambia. This is because most Gambians, including all of the Gambian lawyers, do not know any other Judge of the Supreme Court, besides the Chief Justice. In fact the Gambian Bar Association said they had written to the Chief Justice, Fagbenle, in June 2016 to remind him of the lack of a constituted Supreme Court in the country. If the court had been constituted, the big question would certainly be, why was it done in secret, instead of the constitutional procedure of announcing such appointments to the public, swear in such Judges in public, and publish their names for the public knowledge. Therefore, Maitre Diouf is misinformed about the constitution of the Supreme Court at present, and should quite simply check his facts and back them up with authority, as expected of lawyers. But he seems to be allowing Jammeh and his propagandists to use his intellect like a complete clown.

Furthermore, with regards to the nationality of the Judges, Maitre Diouf should have just asked himself, why a country like The Gambia, whose lawyer is currently serving as the International Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, with Judges heading the International Criminal Tribunals in Rwanda, and has a functioning Bar Association for more than 40 years, is not having its citizens as Judges at the highest court of the land. Rather than bantering about why the country has a right to appoint foreigners. What is wrong with the Gambian lawyers, who are qualified enough to serve as Judges at that court?

The simple answers to these questions will help the Maître to understand why it is inappropriate for the Gambian citizens to be discriminated, in such a way – by their own President – in their own country. If the Maitre is indeed a Maitre, who went to University and studied to gain his law degree, as supposed to buying his law degree, he would understand why people are justified to question the rational behind an all Nigerian Supreme Court Judges deciding an important constitutional question for Gambians in the Gambia.

Finally, Maitre Diouf also claimed to have been motivated to engage in the current Gambian political impasse, as a result of his love for the Gambian people and family relations, as well as his love for justice. This compels one to ask the question, where was Maitre Diouf in the last twenty-two years of Jammeh’s misrule in The Gambia? When Jammeh was arbitrarily arresting, detaining, torturing and killing Gambians. Was Maitre Diouf too busy at the time or unconcerned to notice? He did not seem to have any interest of the Gambian plight then, until after Gambians had voted out Yahya Jammeh, then he wants come to their aid. This begs one to question, whether Maitre Diouf is truly in for Gambians best interest, or he is purely interested in entrenching Yahya Jammeh’s dictatorship over the Gambian people for another five years. Gambians are no fools to fall for such disguise.

If Maitre Diouf have any interest in the plight of the Gambian people, he should simply call on the Out-Going President Yahya Jammeh to relinquish power. The Gambian people have spoken and both he and Yahya Jammeh should respect that!!!


January 3, 2017

These are the Nigerian 419 Judges Jammeh wants to overturn our people’s will!

Chief Justice Fagbenle in his true colours!

 The out-going Gambian President, Yahya Jammeh, who has barely 2 weeks left on his presidency, wants to swear-in Judges, to hear his election petition case within 8 days before the end of his presidency, despite the fact that the court had been dysfunctional for almost two years with many pending appeals.    

The Gambia’s lawyers association called the Gambia Bar Association best described the move as a miscarriage of justice; for the President to select judges for the sole purpose of hearing his own election petition at the Supreme Court. They said it simply makes him both the Judge and claimant at the same time .

The desperate Gambian President is challenging the 1 December 2016 Presidential elections of The Gambia, which he lost to his opponent, President Elect Adama Barrow. President Jammeh, whose constitutional term in office expires on Wednesday, 18 January 2017, is frantically trying to hang on to power at all cost, through the aid of the country’s Supreme Court to overturn the verdict of his people in the Presidential election.

President Jammeh and his government denied reports, during a meeting with the African Bar Association from Port Harcourt, Nigeria, on 21 December 2016, that they do not have a constituted Supreme Court, at the time. The constitution requires the Supreme Court to have at least six Judges, in order to be constituted. The disclosure that the country has a constituted Supreme Court shunned many, including the country’s Bar Association, who were never aware of the same.

It later became clear that the government had lied about having a constituted Supreme Court. Instead they had offered positions to six Judges in the sub-region: five from Nigeria and one from Sierra Leone.  These were: Justice Habeeb A. O. Abiru from Nigeria; Justice Abubacar Datti Yahya from Nigeria; Abubakar Tijani from Nigeria; Obande Festus from Nigeria, Obande Agim from Nigeria; and Nicholas Colin Brown from Sierra Leone.

The six Judges were only offered the positions in somewhere June 2016, but were yet to accept their positions. As a result, the Supreme Court, which had only one Judge and dysfunctional for 2 years, had to adjourn the President’s petition till Tuesday, 10th January 2017 to hear the petition. The hope was that the six Judges would have accepted their positions and would have been in the country to start the case.

However, due to the sensitive political and high profile nature of the case, as well as the desperation shown by the Gambian President by attempting to bribe these Judges; the reputable and distinguished Judges rejected the offers to become Supreme Court Judges of the Gambia at present.

Thereafter, desperate Yahya Jammeh and his Chief Justice Emmanuel Fagbenle have exhorted many other Supreme Court Judges and Court of Appeal Judges in Nigeria to assist in their criminal enterprise to subvert the will of the Gambian people, but failed to convince any senior Judge in Nigeria.

Instead, the desperate President Jammeh and his Chief Justice settled for shameless 419 Judges from Nigeria, who were bribed to pretend to be qualified Judges in Nigeria and have had the requisite competence to sit in any court in The Gambia, including the country’s Supreme Court to hear the President’s election petition. These shameless 419 Nigerian Judges, who have arrived in the country are: Justice Agboola, Justice A.N.C. Ikoro, Justice Uduma, Justice E.E. Ogar, Justice E.O. Dada, Justice Sulaiman, and Justice E.O. Otaba.

In fact 2 of the 7 Judges were recently involved in controversial political cases in The Gambia, involving the UDP protesters, as recent as August 2016. These were Justice E.O. Otaba and Justice E.O. Dada. Justice Otaba had to recuse himself from the case, after he was shamelessly recorded on tape, commenting on the case he was presiding, by a Gambian exiled journalist, Fatou Camara. The case was then transferred to Justice Dada, whose handling of the case forced all of the defense lawyers in the case to withdraw their representation of the Darboe and Co accused UDP protesters.

The Gambian constitution requires that, in order for one to qualify to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court, they must serve at least 5 or 10 years as a Court of Appeal Judge or 12 years a practicing lawyer in both civil and criminal areas of law, in a common law jurisdiction. None of the selected Judges being considered by Jammeh meets that threshold. If anything no one knows their legal practice background, apart from Mr. Fagbenle.

The Gambian Bar Association has stated that these “persons have never been judges or sat in a judicial capacity,” before in any country.  “They were imported and appointed and have demonstrated in several high-profile judgments that they will not take any steps contrary to the will of the President. It is, therefore, a vital priority for the Government of Nigeria and all Bar Associations to condemn the actions and capacity of all judges of foreign nationality currently sitting in Gambia and call for their immediate repatriation to prevent them from undermining the will of the Gambian people,” they added

It is therefore, advised that no Gambian should respect or recognise any decision made by these Nigerian 419 Judges.


January 1, 2017

Daba Muhammed Kuyateh in the hands of NIA arrested for exercising his constitutional right

Reports are feeding in that the Gambia’s spy agency NIA is going after innocent people harassing , intimidating and  in some cases arresting them for merely expressing their constitutional rights. People wearing T Shirts of Gambia has decided have not done anything wrong but only affirming  a decision they have made on December 1st 2016 for change of government. The ordinary people of the Gambia have every right to uphold the election result which is nothing but the will of the heroic people of our country. We gathered information earlier this week that arrest warrants where issued for the leaders of the Gambia has decided campaign but knowing the public outcry such a dumb decision would generate the coward NIA is now going after young innocent youth in the street corners wearing the Gambia has decided t shirts. The latest to fall victim to this cowardly sinister project is Daba Muhammed Kuyateh. Young Kuyateh was arrested yesterday in Bakoteh for just merely wearing  a t shirt that affirms the will of the Gambian people.

Kibaaro contacted family members of the younster and they have confirmed his arrest by the notorious NIA. They have tried to establish contact with their loved one but to no avail and as we write this story Muhammed is still in the hands of the NIA.  We are vehemently reminding who ever must have orchestrated the arrest of this youngster that the Gambian community is aware of the arrest  and if anything happend to him they would be held responsible. The NIA should desist from such cowardly acts of trying to silence  an awaken populace. The people of the Gambia have decided and the shackles of fear are already broken into pieces so there is no way they can cow an energized youth population. Be aware that all crimes and atrocities are being documented and surely justice will be divered sooner or later.


December 31, 2016

President Jammeh (left) will be forced to transfer power to President Elect Adama Barrow

Gambians calling for Jammeh to go down crowded a soldier on guard

In a telephone interview with Kibaaro News, a senior Military Officer of the Gambia National Army with the rank of Major, has disclosed that they are working on a plan which will see a Jola led military mutiny to force and ensure President Yahya Jammeh’s transfer of power to a Mandinka President – Elect, His Excellency Adama Barrow, come 19 January 2017. The Senior Officer, who requested anonymity, explained to Kibaaro that they want their actions to send a clear message to President Yahya Jammeh and bigots like him to understand that the Gambia is a one big family, which can never divided.

He said, as a Jola, he has cousins and nephews from all other tribes of the Gambia; and there are too many Jola soldiers like him in the Gambia National Army, who will do all they can to prevent Jammeh and his bunch of criminal jugulars from setting the Gambia on fire and turning it into the West African Rwanda.

The Officer asserted that he and over 50 junior and senior officers of the Gambian National Army, ranging from the ranks of Lieutenants to Colonels, have already pledged allegiance and are actively working on the plan to ensure the forceful transfer of power from President Jammeh to President Elect Adama Barrow on 19 January 2017. He disclosed that the majority of these officers are: Jolas, Mandinkas, Fulas, Sereres, Manjagoes, and Wolofs; but they all agreed for the Jolas to lead the operation, as a symbol of tribal unity in the Gambia.

The Officer explained his request for anonymity for now, as simply to avert the attention of the authorities from thwarting their plans. He has however provided his details including: his full name, rank and the military camp, stationed at, for our publication after Mid-Night of 18th January 2016; if Jammeh has not relinquished power by then. He will further be happy to conduct a live radio interview with Bamba Mass on Kibaaro Radio from 19 January 2016.

He assured the security and protection of President – Elect Adama Barrow come Mid-Night of 18 January 2016. He explained that they are currently following the constitution of the Gambia, which is why they continue to respect the presidency of President Yahya Jammeh, until 18 January 2016. He explained after Mid-Night of 18 January 2016, they will activate their operational plans and will cease to recognize the presidency of President Yahya Jammeh and will conduct an operation to arrest him and hand him over to President Elect Adama Barrow.

He further wishes to assure the Gambian public that, there will be no war between Gambia National Army and ECOMOG forces. He disclosed that they are in touch with some of the ECOMOG forces, who are likely to be deployed into the Gambia from Senegal and Nigeria, about their cooperation and assistance, should their deployment become necessary.

He assured: “we are not going to fight for Jammeh, for what, against our own votes, because we never voted for Jammeh”. He confessed that they have grown despondent with the direction of the country under Yahya Jammeh. He disclosed that even the most senior officers in the army are suffering. “Gambians think that the military are enjoying under Jammeh, but they don’t know our situation. No matter how much he pays us, our salaries cannot afford the prices of local commodities for ourselves and our extended family members, it is just as crazy for us as everyone else in this country my brother!”.

He added despite all these hardships, “everyone in the Gambia view us as being Jammeh and even worse, if you are a Jola; my brother!” 

Gambian soldier stood on guard as citizens celebrate the defeat of Jammeh!

He said the victory of Adama Barrow brought hope for them too in the Barracks, but could not express their joy, as of yet. He said soldiers would stage their own celebrations after the york of Yahya Jammeh is lifted from their necks on 19 January 2017. He expressed: “even if the coalition dissolved the army, as many of you in the Diaspora are calling for, we will still celebrate, for the new Gambia will create other jobs for all of us in the Gambia. We will also be happy in our homes without the constant fear and suspicion we work under daily in the Gambia National Army”.  

He concluded by calling on all Gambian National Army soldiers to pledge their loyalties to President Elect of the Gambia, Adama Barrow, from Mid-Night of 18 January 2017 and disobey all orders from any quarters, including the Army Head Quarters, if it is anything to do with defending or supporting Yahya Jammeh.


June 23, 2016
Those urging me to issue a statement on Gambia are not more patriotic than me - ICC Prosecutor

Those urging me to issue a statement on Gambia are not more patriotic than me – ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bom Bensouda

In an interview aired on kibaaro radio and other sister Gambian online radios the ICC prosecutor Madam Fatou Bom Bensouda defended her position on why ICC has not issued a statement on Gambia. In the interview that was conducted by Tijan Masanneh ceesay the ICC prosecutor cited the Rome statute and deliberated on the mandate of ICC to clarify why she has not issued a statement on Gambia since the political upheaval started in April on events leading to the scheduled December 2016 presidential elections.  According to her the ICC is not a human rights body but a judicial body and she has no mandate to issue a statement each time human rights abuses are reported in any given country.

The ICC prosecutor who hails from Banjul, the Gambia has recently come under fire for remaining silent and not issuing statement on the political crises in the country like she did on Burundi, Nigeria, Sudan and Kenya.  Gambian activists have been mad with the prosecutor over her silence on Gambia accusing her of being a former enabler of the current dictatorship in the country. Madam Bensouda once served as minister of Justice under the leadership of the current Gambian government and was sacked from her ministerial position and later on secured the position of ICC prosecutor. Madam Prosecutor’s response to those Gambian activists urging her to issue a statement on Gambia is that they are not more patriotic than her and argues that when all conditions are met for her to issue a statement on Gambia she will issue a statement.  “That I’m a national of Gambia doesn’t permit me to fulfill my role in any differently than I would do in another situation” reiterated Madam Prosecutor.

According Madam Bom Bensouda the bases of the statements she issues as prosecutor is article 25 1,2 of the Rome statute as well as the specific references to the preventive mandate of the court in the preamble of the Rome statue which states as follows: – Determined to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus to contribute to the prevention of such crimes. She pointed out that her  office is aware of the recent events in the Gambia and in particular they are aware of the death in custody of an opposition activist. “In fact as soon as I heard the media report I assigned my team to assess the situation. I did that because in every state party to the ICC when any of these events are happening on their territories we monitor closely and we try to assess what is going on” buttressed the prosecutor.

She further elaborated that  her professional obligation demand that she apply the Rome statute, the legal framework of the Rome statute and to apply it consistently, to apply it independently and to apply it impartially and that is how she conducts herself without exception.  She said that she do issue statements  but only in specific circumstances namely;  when her office sees that there is tangible risk of war crimes, crimes against humanity or other crimes that are committed on a large-scale they issue these statements.    “The situation in Gambia has not reached that point yet. If it was to be the case for instance further arrests were to result in further deaths in custody I would have robustly voiced  my concerned as I did in other situations when this was required “  Madam Prosecutor further emphasized.

Despite the death in custody of an opposition activist and the dangerous threat of ethnic cleansing issued by the president of the republic of the Gambia the ICC prosecutor  still believes the time is not yet right for her to issue a statement or warning to those at the helm of power in Gambia. The whole world is watching and history is recording.


June 9, 2016
Ambassador C. Patricia Alsup

Ambassador C. Patricia Alsup

According to the Embassy of the United States of America in Gambia the government of the Gambia has unexpectedly withdrawn police protection which resulted in the embassy closing all non-essential services from Thursday June 9 until further notice.   The Embassy has not elaborated on what must have triggered such a drastic action from the regime of Yahya Jammeh.  The Embassy however indicated in the press release that it will continue to closely monitor the situation and will keep the general public informed as events unfold.

The Gambia has recently witnessed an unprecedented wave of protests against the rogue regime of Yahya Jammeh a former wrestler who has ruled the country with an iron fist for over two decades.  His rule has been characterized by serious crackdown on dissent punctuated with killings of opponents, disappearances without trace and brutal torture tactics.  The leader of the main opposition party ; United Democratic Party(UDP) Lawyer Ousainou Darboe  together with other party militants and concerned Gambians are still held behind bars for protesting against the killing of  opposition youth leader Solo Sandeng.  The detainees have been plying to court house from Mile 11 central prisons for close to two months without bail.  Concerned Gambians show solidarity in numbers around court house in Banjul at every court proceeding. Because of the tense atmosphere around every court proceeding  which sometimes results in confrontation with security personnel the country has been gauged as unstable and some western countries have cautioned their citizens to stay away from public gatherings in Gambia.

The action of the regime of Yahya Jammeh to withdraw police protection to the U.S embassy has not come as a surprise for many saw it coming in his rhetoric against the west.  Some observers say Jammeh may have issued such directives to express his anger over the light sentences given to the 30th December 2014 statehouse attackers.  Jammeh expected heavy sentences on the attackers but to his utter dismay one of the attackers Papa faal walked out free while the rest received fines and prison sentences ranging from one year to six months.

Another reason for the tyrant’s madness to the U.S could be the surveillance drones that unveiled his nefarious timber smuggling from the Cassamance forest in collaboration with Chinese companies in which he allegedly made 240 million dollars. Observers say he believes it is  the U.S through Africom  that must have tipped off the Senegalese authorities on the magnitude of the illegal timber trade with the help of images supplied by surveillance drones.

Concerned citizens of the Gambia have been clamoring for a travel ban on Jammeh and his cronies, such a decision, they believe would be a heavy blow on Jammeh and his close associates especially his wife who flies to the U.S every now and then.  There seems to be a tug of war between the U.S  and the Gambia , how that war would end is not clear but it would greatly depend on what long term measures the U.S government would adopt on such an unexpected withdrawal of police protection to  the U.S  Embassy Banjul.


June 2, 2016

Inset: Sheriff Bojang Jnr of WDR interviewing ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda

By Yanks Darboe

The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Mrs Fatou Bensouda, erred in her justification for remaining silent over human rights violations taking place in the country of her origin, The Gambia, under the dictatorship of brutal Dictator Yahya Jammeh.

Speaking with the West African Radio Journalist, Sheriff Bojang Jnr. the ICC’s Prosecutor tried to justify her failure to even issue a statement on the Gambia’s ongoing political violences, as due to the role of her court, which she emphasised is not a human rights court, but rather a court established for specific crimes, which she explained as: crimes against humanity; genocide and war crimes. However, the Madam Prosecutor failed to educate her audience about the courts, which ought to be classified as Human Rights Courts and what makes them different to her court, the ICC.

The Madam Prosecutor’s explanations are quite simply inaccurate, flawed and contrived, to simply justify her hypocrisy and indifference to the crimes of her former boss Dictator Yahya Jammeh, against her own people of the Gambia, including her former colleague at the Gambian Bar and opposition leader, Lawyer Ousainou Darboe. Otherwise, if the Madam Prosecutor truly believes and meant what she explained in the interview, then she does not understand the role of her court and was wrong to postulate that her critics confused her court, as being a human rights court.

You can access Madam Prosecutor’s interview from the link below:

To assist those unfamiliar with the notion of Human rights; human rights are quite simply what could be best described as the God given rights to every human being; such as the right to life, right to justice, rights to freedom from torture, false imprisonment, rights to family life, private life, religion, political opinion, etc. Issues relating to this matters in states, where such rights are valued, respected and protected are usually dealt with by the traditional courts of those states. In Europe, the highest appellate court for such cases is the ECHR and in US Supreme Court, as well as in many other countries. These are the courts, the ICC Madam Prosecutor, in this interview, wants us to believe are human rights courts, but not hers, the ICC. This is quite simply a buffoonery!

The traditional courts in most countries deal with such human rights violations, if those states prosecute or enforce their human rights laws appropriately under their laws, such as: rape, murder, false imprisonment, etc. But this is at most against individuals behaving irresponsibly or unfortunately.

However, where this violence or crimes of torture, unlawful killings, rape, false imprisonment becomes systematic and perpetrated by the state itself or the state blatantly failed to act appropriately in redressing such violations, then the appropriate court to bring an action against those perpetrators, including the head of state of that country, is at the ICC. Therefore how can such a court be described as not a human rights court?

Furthermore, the crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute, is quite simply crimes against human rights of individuals. This Madam Prosecutor is disingenuous in portraying such crimes, as some sort of specific crimes. Quite frankly there is nothing specific about them, they are simply crimes against human rights of citizens, which a particular state, signatory to the Rome Statue, is either an accomplish to the crime or failed to prosecute the perpetrators.

Secondly, the Madam Prosecutor further aimed to fool Gambians and the world that the crimes against humanity are only limited to unlawful killings. This could be inferred from her gravity argument. As she explained that she issued statement about Burundi, because the scale of deaths reached 400. In other words, she will issue statement on Gambia when the death toll passed 400.

This is not simply wrong but insane. In fact there was no such scale of deaths or gravity in Nigeria, when she issued her statement about that country or in Guinea. But she would want you to believe that there was a potential of such gravity in those countries.

However, that is not even the point the Madam Prosecutor is getting wrong here! The error on her part is interpreting Article 6 of the Rome Statue as limiting crimes against humanity to only unlawful killings. No, it does not only apply to killings alone! It includes torture, rape and arbitrary detentions. If those crimes are properly investigated, torture and arbitrary detentions alone warrants her office to file charges of crimes against humanity against Dictator Yahya Jammeh; not to talk of making a statement!!

Therefore, if the Prosecutor is indeed sincere with her words in this interview, then she should resign from her job due to incompetency or she should be sacked, for she is not doing her job properly!

But I doubt if that is the case here; I think this Madam Prosecutor is quite simply lying to justify her indifference to her boss’ crimes against her own people!!!