Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category


November 27, 2014
Reads :400





The largest constituency in The Gambia has always been the one opposed to the regime of Yahya Jammeh. This is not an opinion but a statement of fact as shown in the last measure of his standing with The Gambian people in the previous general election when more than half of the registered voters either voted for his opponents or stayed away from the polls entirely. For an entrenched incumbent that has ruthlessly employed all the instruments of government to propagate itself, and suppress its legal opponents by allowing them to campaign for only 11 days while padding the voter rolls with illegal /foreign voters, failing to muster less than half of the registered electorate was a manifest rejection of the regime and everything it stands for. This is not a beloved regime but more of an albatross hanging on the collective neck of an entire nation.

However, the verified existence of a solid majority that is fundamentally opposed to the regime is insufficient to take down a tyrant willing to use any means to cling onto power if it is not coupled with a comprehensive strategy designed to harness and leverage the power of the majority to ensure a single outcome: regime change. What is also clear and borne by the last general election is that regime opponents are perturbed and demoralized by the pervasive and unreasonable conduct of some politicians that has doomed serious efforts at unity. Every effort in the last three election cycles to unify regime opponents on the ground has been scuttled for one reason or another even as it has always been abundantly clear to all involved that this job of saving our country and ourselves requires the combined efforts all acting together.

Today we stand at a cross road with a widely despised regime its North Korea style propaganda notwithstanding on the one hand, a seething majority of the population  with a variety of concerns and a collection of opposition politicians who at most times are selfless and inspiring but have seen their collective work and sacrifice hindered by tactical errors and the recalcitrance of a few among them who value validation of their warped sense of duty  more than the consequences of the costly and misguided steps they take. Advancing reasons for failing to unite no matter how fervently held is not a substitute for good and far sighted leadership. Gambians are not necessarily condemned to endure a vile regime when a vast majority have manifestly demonstrated their disapproval provided regime opponents are properly galvanized to deliver the knockout punch. To reach out to and deliver the majority of the Gambian people to save our nation, I propose the following:

1-All the political parties, individuals and third party entities that fully supported the reform agenda outlined in the G6 memorandum which formed the basis for sitting out two election cycles should embark on a comprehensive campaign in the length and breadth of the country .The purpose would be to present it as the only acceptable way and route to elections in 2016 and failure to adhere to all its stipulations  in a verifiable and timely manner would tantamount to nullifying the 2016 Presidential election. This would give the population a legitimate battle cry around which to build a mass movement because the choice would be for the first time to either have a clean election or none at all and both outcomes would have the same result of regime change because a reviled tyrant who insists on hanging on to power against the wishes of a galvanized majority will find himself on the losing side.

2-The same message delivered by the political parties and their allies in the broader democratic constituency should be formally presented to all accredited diplomats in the Gambia in writing and through organised briefings. This would notify our friends and partners of the intentions of the democratic forces and the stakes involved.

3-The same message should also be formally delivered by a delegation to ECOWAS, AU, EU, UN and the US and UK governments. Once the agenda is clearly articulated and communicated to The Gambian people and the broader international community, the priority and emphasis would become maintaining the mobilization of the broad constituency by employing traditional retail politics tools augmented by other methods to enhance effectiveness and preparedness. If the regime decides to ignore the legitimate demands contained in the G6 memorandum, the Gambian people will conclude that the government has wilfully decided to abrogate the constitution by refusing to subject itself to a free and fair election at the expiry of its mandate. The government at that point would be illegitimate and the mobilized population will then exercise their national duty to end impunity and restore democracy

4-With the established politicians in the lead and the unified message fully and clearly articulated to all constituencies, the parameters of the ground game for regime change would have been set. It will be the duty of every Gambian in the diaspora who supports the change agenda to contribute to its full and timely funding. I am confident by the will of Allah; every resource needed to see the strategy through will be made available.

On the other hand, if the forces of democracy fail to mobilize this seemingly deliverable constituency, the tyrant would resort to his true and tried methods of running a fraudulent election, shine TV cameras on one or two misguided pseudo opponents prancing around for the briefest of campaign periods and declare himself winner despite his clear lack of support from the majority of the Gambian people. The accumulated grievances fear and persistent humiliation of our people has to be appropriately channelled to an effective mass movement vehicle to bring regime change. Consequently the country cannot afford vacillating politicians who put ideology over common sense and seem to be oblivious to the existential threats we face, as a nation .The only thing we demand of our politicians is to act affirmatively to harness and deliver the totality of their natural constituency by submitting themselves to the will of the people. They have the opportunity to lead the nation out of the clutches of murderous tyrant and forestall a further decent into the abyss.

Karamba Touray


32 Gambian Refugees Facing Possible Removal from Malta

November 24, 2014
Reads :1167
One of the detainees in cuffs

One of the detainees in cuffs

A group of Gambian refugees currently at a detention camp in Malta are still at a risk of deportation despite public outcry over the past couple of months. If readers could recall the brutal regime of the Gambia struck a deal with the Maltese government to repatriate Gambians in detention camps in Malta some months ago. This deal caught international attention because of the appalling human rights situation in the Gambia. Gambians in the diaspora started confronting the Maltese government on their decision to return these Gambians; citing fears of possible torture, extrajudicial executions, and disappearance without trace. It came to the notice of Kibaaro that these Gambian refugees are still under detention and facing possible removal from Malta. They are said to be in detention for the past six months.

Kibaaro was able to get in touch with them. They express fear of possible removal from Malta into the hands of a government that is known for dishonoring agreements and gruesomely maltreating innocent citizens. We were informed that the group comprises of Gambians of different backgrounds; soldiers, businessmen, students…etc. The group speaking to Kibaaro express disappointment in the way they are treated at the detention camp. “We are treated like criminals despite the fact that we have not committed any crime as our movement is seriously curtailed” charged the purported spokesman of the group. He lamented that even when they fell sick and had to be transported to hospital for treatment they are put in handcuffs and chains. He also complained that their asylum cases are not fully processed and yet the authorities are adamant to send them back to Gambian which is breach of the refugee convention.

It is important to remind the government of Malta that the President of the Gambia is very unreliable. No government should strike a deal with a rogue state especially when it has to do with lives of refugees. It is the same Yahya Jammeh who made a proclamation some time ago that Gambian asylum seekers are out to tarnish the image of the country. We remind the Maltese government that a law which carries a heavy sentence has been enacted in the Gambia for so-called tarnishing the image of the country. There is a high risk that these Gambian youth in Maltese detention camps would be treated as enemies of the state and would therefore face full wrath of dictator Jammeh if forcefully returned home.


November 24, 2014
Reads :769


“The Gambian Embassy in Taipei left an indelible bad image as it hurriedly and unceremoniously nullified diplomatic relation its host nation”, a Taipei source informed Kibaaro News.  Long serving staff of the mission were neither paid their salaries nor compensated for their services to the Gambia government. The Jammeh regime still owes them several months’ salaries and benefits. To the chagrin of the former embassy staff, Jammeh makes them feel it is their fault that their salaries are not paid and the marriage of convenience between Banjul and Taipei dissolved unceremoniously.

“For example, the private secretary to the Ambassador, Ms Shirley Lin had worked for more than ten years in the Embassy. She even worked under Essa Bokar Sey. The Utility driver Lamin Camara, a Gambian had work since 1996. They spent most of their lives working for the mission and they were not given a single butut when the mission closed. Even though they work up to the last minute before the embassy closed”, lamented the source furiously.

“There was an officer from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Taipei who  transacted the mission’s vehicle papers for shipment also pleaded that the mission should try and give them something to hang onto before they get employment. Nevertheless, with all these efforts and intervention, the Jammeh regime blatantly refused to pay them their salaries. As you know all the missions are housed in one main building in Tai Mou Taipei. Other Gambian missions are also very angry about what Jammeh did to the colleagues in Taipei. They said the Gambian government should not have done that after these people devoted all their time working for the Mission”, added the source.

“What other missions do is they will calculate each year one spends with the mission and they give you a month’s full salary as bonus. As a result, the Private Secretary should have been paid ten months wages as she has spent ten years working for the mission judiciously.  The same applies to Lamin Camara. Lamin Camara has a family in the Gambia which he supports with his earnings from the mission. He is currently out of work and is finding it difficult to up keep himself and his family”, further disclosed the source.

“The mistreatment of people is being extended beyond the Gambia boarders by this repressive regime. As we speak it has led to the mistrust between Gambians in Taiwan. I think the Jammeh regime needs to improve its operation/dealing with the international world and abstain from tarnishing the image of the Country”, advised the source.

“In my next deliberation, I will avail you detailed accounts and in-depth budgets of the Missions as well as monies owe on school fees and health insurance for local staff and Gambian students in Taipei”, promised the source.


November 22, 2014
Reads :1021
Sulayman Jeng

Sulayman Jeng



“This ‘struggle’ needs a rethink and a new direction, but the egos are too big for our own good and the interests are too multifaceted”, charged Bax as he reacts to comments on Ebrima G Sankareh’s article captioned “Amadou Samba Saga a Gambian predicament” on In his opinion, anyone who opposes President Jammeh becomes a hero regardless the person’s history and anyone who chooses to manifest the slightest association with Jammeh despites the person’s history becomes a prey for the Gambian nonconformists. A very interesting deduction. Let us be reminded as humans, sometimes our opinions about others, ideas, issues and incidents are often shaped by our personal beliefs, upbringing, education and experiences. As a result, we take sides here and there. Similarly, we tend to be more sympathetic to people and things we are more familiar than otherwise as aptly captured in a Mandinka maxim: Mbalafa mbe loo ngo lebala.

Nonetheless, to objectively dispense justice, one is always admonished to step outside the box and look at it holistically without any opinionated premise. I intend to, in my attempt to cut the branches before bringing down the tree, to step outside the box. However, if I am found wanton at the end, just excuse my human err and remember is human to err.

Is it President Jammeh who is on the wrong side of history or the Gambian nonconformists in the diaspora? On the one hand, many who perceived Jammeh as a charismatic leader will hasten to affirm, he is not. They, often justify President Jammeh’s good leadership with the building of roads, schools, hospitals, the university, airport and his extravagance/generosity. The Gambian dissidents in the diaspora are the enemies of Gambia because they tarnish the image of the country to the outside world.  On the other hand, “the struggle” without a second thought concludes President Jammeh is a non-starter and epitomises evil. What are their reasons for wanting Jammeh go at all cost? His human rights records, muzzling the freedom of speech, poor economic policies, heavy handedness, corruption and political thuggery.

In development, before it becomes meaningful and sustainable, first it must be what the grassroots want. For instance, if you go to Kanilai and want to bring development to their doorsteps, you must first identify their urgent need, example, a day care centre, horticultural garden, market or health centre. However, if you believed that you are the expert and knows what they want without even consulting them, you will end up giving them a white elephant. Who financed the roads, hospitals and etc supervised by Jammeh and his government? The Gambian tax payers. Albeit others will argue the projects of all these developments were already initiated by the Jawara regime, but the credit goes to Jammeh and his government for implementing them. Have Gambians become better off in their living standard, access to employment and freedom under President Jammeh? Is building hospitals and roads a seal of approval for the Jammeh regime to unlawfully arrest and detain Gambians at will without been charged for more than 72 hour stipulated law? Are many Gambians still not languishing in detention without trial under Jammeh’s leadership?

Prior to 22nd July 1994, Yahya Jammeh was never a headline in the Gambia. Today he occupies the highest office in the country. Consequently, he is more a public figure than a private person. Thus, his every action attracts attention, analysis and reaction. “Ku mbu gutt hatch yee bowla, bull butt burki”. Is there any Gambian who wants his or her father, brother, mother or sister to disappear in the middle of the night without trace? Does any of us wants to be locked up and tortured for not committing a crime? I guess not but these are the things happening in the Gambia under the orders and watch of President Jammeh. Does standing up and speaking out against such injustices makes one a bad citizen and enemy of progress? Come on brothers and sisters, no one hates Yahya Jammeh as a person but his deeds are nauseating, inhuman and appalling. How many times has President Jammeh openly threatens members of his cabinet with imprisonment if they dare fail to execute his orders? Perhaps you may find that amusing but certainly I do not see the funny side of it.

There are many Gambians working for the government under Jammeh and no one hassles them. They do not constantly fear that they will be lynched like Amadou Samba experienced. If any Gambian openly supports and justifies the atrocities taking place in a daily basis in the Gambia must sure be alert that he or she will go down with Jammeh and those who attempt to run will be hunted down and brought to answer for their deeds. Has Boto of Boto Construction or Tapha Njie of Taf Construction been ever harassed or ruffled like Amadou Samba? Let us not fool ourselves fellow Gambians. If President Jammeh was really synonymous to progress our youths will not risk their lives across the turbulent Atlantic Ocean in search of greener pastures in Europe. Joining the struggle will not wash away blood in anyone’s hands once they are soaked. When the day of reckoning arises, each will be accountable for your own contribution in enabling the dictatorship however small it may be. Even if the commissions will not punish the person but Gambians would want to know how, why, what, when and where you have enabled Jammeh. If Allah had not allowed us to repent after sinning, we would all rot in hell. Repentance accords a person a fresh start. Those who show remorse will certainly be forgiven as the South Africans have manifested in their reconciliation effort. But Jammeh feels he has not wronged any of us but we wronged him instead. Very funny. Was I biased?

Sulayman Jeng

Birmingham, UK


November 21, 2014
Reads :377




Dislodging a sitting government, the 1994 coup d’état, translated to a cynical assault on Gambia’s democratic governance and culture. Overtime, the junta arrogantly disregarded the rule of law, which for a decade was a Gambian enviable norm. Constitutionalism and its fundamental principles of separation of powers reinforced by the independence of the judiciary were systematically and practically scrapped by a dictatorial regime which promised us accountability, transparency and probity. The fundamental principles of good governance enshrined in our constitution and way of life is replaced with a one man autocratic rule thus eroding the very republican values on which our once beacon of democracy was founded. An atmosphere of unabated harassment, unlawful arrests and detentions became a familiar face in every Gambian household. The cold denial of Gambians their innate rights as humans and citizens was executed in coerced despotism and chilling intolerance for dissent. In the process, state institutions also changed in nature and character, from constituting machinery devoted to public service and descended into a sectarian outfit.

The APRC regime gradually became the object of contempt in the country for its illegitimacy and its record of gross human rights violation. For its survival, it came to depend on ferocious repression, executive lawlessness and impunity to enforce the iron-fisted control imposed over the country. Despite the return of civil rule in 1996, the Gambia still remains a sham democracy with no credible elections. The Jammeh regime has created an electoral commission which fosters only his APRC’s objectives whilst denying Gambians meaning say over who rules them and how their affairs are governed. In effect, today, our country and people is hostage to an illegitimate one man rule. Suffice it to say the elections are characterised by deceit, thuggery and fraudulence. In order for Dictator Jammeh to cling onto power, he recklessly resorted to use of violence and intimidation to enforce his unpopular rule. The regime’s appalling record of misrule, ranges from human rights abuses and looting of national resources for his personal enrichment. Political opposition has been crushed and the independent media muzzled. The regime has effectively shut down all avenues for the expression of dissent. Constitutionally guarantee freedom of speech for Gambians has become a gold dust in the country.

This appalling situation of abusive rule, combine with political intolerance, killings, disappearance and intimidation has transformed the Gambia into a concentration camp. Governance and human rights crises which today are the subject of widespread expression of concern among Gambians both at home and in the diaspora as well as within  the international community. Democracy is the full protection of human right, good life, a life without threat, without fear and the provision of basic necessities such as affordable living cost, water and electric supplies. These are benefits inherent to democracy and are accorded to people who live under democratic rule. The freedom that comes with democracy for ordinary citizens brings a number of tangible benefits that are embodied in such values as participation, inclusiveness, transparency, accountability and representation. Citizens of democratic states are left alone to choose to be actively involved at both local and national levels of politics. They do no fear the arbitrary abuse of state powers and know that when they have an encounter with the state, laws are in place to protect them from unnecessary state intrusion into their basic rights. The due process of the law unfolds throughout that engagement to attain justice for the deserving. Their participation takes place formally and less institutionally through processes or informal and less institution through civil society organization and social movement activities. Moreover, they enjoy the freedom to speak out, criticise and make demands on government without fear of repressive reprisals. The basic framework of participation and accountability provided by democracy and a people’s regime is seen as ultimately beneficial for everyone.

Babucarr Darboe

Essex, Chelmsford


November 21, 2014
Reads :345


Gambia's Gangster President, Yahya Jammeh, who loves to visit the UN but block the visiting his backyard!!

Gambia’s Gangster President, Yahya Jammeh


The remaining questions: How do we chop down the tree? When do we chop down the big tree – before the start of new project or at the end or somewhere in-between?  The answers to these questions are not simply what we wish but what we could, what’s feasible and what serves our goal(s).

I never supported the July 22, 1994 coup and there are very few things I like, if any, about Jawara administration. I know not much but my politics and sociocultural values remained the same and unwavering – because they’re principled and virtuous. I must say in 1994 I was in Gambia – hence being in America for long surely broadened my knowledge/perspectives but didn’t create them. In the early going I too supported a political party – attended party rallies around the country, bought green tea (attaya) for youths, bought t-shirts, put in my little time and money, some known to party bosses and others not. I also argued favorably for some union of parties in those days. This is in part to demonstrate that my thoughts about politics in Gambia are neither abstract concepts nor theorizing Americanization of The Gambia but a product of a package of lifetime experiences. That experience includes a decade of working and living in villages at all regions of The Gambia. In addition I hailed from remote Kombo South Village of Jambur, a very politically charged settlement during PPP era and as well a son of Badibunka couple, who settled there in late 1900s in search for good farmlands. I knocked off my partisan affiliation not because I don’t like the party, its leaders, its members or what it stand for but because I realized our problems are not where we’re waging the battle.  The traditional tool of a political party is to seek office through the ballot and effect desired policy changes. The Gambia doesn’t need policy changes instead the creation of functioning institutions of democracy. Political Parties has a central role in making that happen, but not on the vote for me agenda instead as change agents and building capacities on the very fundamentals of democracy.

The changes needed to fix Gambia cannot and will not be done a government. It would take capacitated citizens of The Gambia to demand with their time, property and maybe the ultimate price. Such capacities do not current exist among most of the population. It has to be built and that will take generations. Adding salt to injury our problems are products of compounded events of our own actions over the past 50 years. They’re now complicated in that they became norms, religions and social standards that penetrates every fabric of our daily living transactions. It will take cumbersome but deliberate political processes along side social-engineering (reorientation) to halt the degeneration not just into oligarchy but also our social mindset. The concepts of a republic and democratic governance will be a learning processes for all of us – is a lifestyle and not a government.  For sustenance we should be able to live it on a daily basis and is not always pretty before our governments can be truly expected to conform! This would require a visionary leadership of a citizen(s) that organize and mobilize masses of capacitated citizens.

The response – “Yahya would/won’t…”.  If this is our outlook to the problem (what Yahya would/won’t or want/not want), then we might as well keep quiet, close our eyes, follow his directives and go help weed his farms – which he will like. Yet still stop all efforts trying to organize in the diaspora or helping out the opposition parties because he wouldn’t like that either. This thought process is troubling and defeatist.

Others respond – Burama is a theorist or lived in America and want to carbon copy American democracy onto Gambia. I refuted those 2 assertions in the second paragraph – that am a typical Gambian product and live it every day. My views are very well informed by basic Gambian values. The fundamentals of democracy are not any more about America than they’re found in the teachings of our cherished religions of Islam and Christianity.  Those 2 religions informed most of our values and virtues. I must add though learning from the experiences of others is neither a weakness nor a cheating – it’s strength and basic human progression especially if you acknowledge them.

Some argued – Burama is flat out wrong and his proposals won’t work. They could be right my proposal won’t work. But this is not about Burama’s.  It’s about finding a solution(s) and Burama happened to propose what he thinks would work.  It’s about what we can agree to work on. It’s about you bringing an alternative proposal. It’s our civic duty, if not responsibility to be part of the crowd searching for solutions.  For about 20 years is the same old tried proposal of some opposition coalition to contest elections against the Yahya they already said “would/won’t….”

Folks our fight is not about Yahya! This fight is not about what Yahya want or not and/or would/won’t!  Equally this fight is not about a political party, group of friends, tribes, men/women of property, etc. On one hand when we make our struggle Yahya we shackled ourselves into a zero sum solution other than hope for a divine intervention and/or another military take over.  On the other hand if we make it about parties, friends, tribes, diaspora, etc. we attract people with similar traits – that number will always be in minority compared to the national population.

Our fight is about is the PROMISE of the nation at the dawn of independent nationhood – A Democratic Republic of The Gambia. This is our legitimate claim and no permission required to make those 2-words in our name count. The Republic is our collective ownership. Democracy is our equitable participation in the management of our common property. We neither need Yahya’s permission to make that claim nor do we care what he likes, want or otherwise.  This claim also can’t/shouldn’t wait party or group to assume power – that will not produce an institutional democracy. The claim has to be dictated by capacitated people with a committed leadership. Such leadership could come from political party (ies)/group(s) but drastic stiff from current mode of operations and over all strategies.

Recently it appears some came around the fact that current efforts to organize opposition for elections against Yahya are cul de sac. Though they still see Yahya as the obstructionist but failed to connect that his strength comes from our inaction/weakness. As stated above this view fall into the zero sum solution hence they’re cozying up to the idea of military take over rather than our own Democracy Agenda.  One would have thought our own experiences of overthrow of bad PPP produced worst A(F)PRC. The same is the case all over our sub-region. Why do we now think another military takeover is our way out?

I was taught how to fell a tree with a power saw. One of the techniques is to wedge the tree. This allows you determine the fall direction, less cutting time and avoid blade pinching.

Equally to solve the Yahya problem we shouldn’t made it a wrestling contest – he’s likely to win that. Nor should we out source such an important civic responsibility/duty to an individual/ group of people with guns. Probably out sourcing here is a misnomer after all – very likely we wouldn’t choose those would-be coupists. It will likely come as a surprising imposition on our sovereignty. Neither should we hope for divine intervention – the same God is with all of us including Yahya.

Yahya is the big tree in the plot that has to go for new development plans. It has to go but we have to decide how he goes otherwise it will cause damages to other trees and infrastructures. He had 20 years and counting to grow. He amassed power including befriending some in the free world who should be our support had we properly counter. Yahya recently ordered his arms men to stop our people from prayers at their places and times of choosing. Denying Muslims to pray according to their religious believes/norms/sanctions amounts to ‘Fatwa’ – punishable with death.  If anything should trigger machetes dismembering those guarding the praying grounds should be this but didn’t. No wonder besieging the DC Embassy or demonstrations along the route of Yahya’s motorcade without a coherent democracy agenda is simply pretentious. To appear to be doing something is one thing and another our actions adding value to the ultimate price. These actions could be meaningful if in coordination with a democratic demand. Without such agenda such actions are simply to anger Yahya. That might be a exciting feelings in our circles but has no value addition to the cause.

This is politics! Lets utilize the tested political tools to achieve our goal(s). There are many case studies in history we can reference. In order to do this we have to articulate a cause to sell. That can’t neither be simply Yahya is bad nor a drive to propel X or Y to the presidency. It has to be the promise of Gambia’s founding – A Democratic Republic Of The Gambia! With such a defined cause we would in addition need someone (an organization[s]) to sell it for us to create a larger circle of friends/supporters (political leverage). The larger our circle the smaller Yahya’s. With this new strength we can begin to demand democracy. Any changes secured/gained will equal proportional decline of Yahya and dictatorship in general. In the eventual Gambia the institutions of democracy will be the custodian of state based on law and not individuals.

On the other hand current efforts such as a single opposition candidate or coup or civil disobedience and/or some monolithic diaspora organization will not achieve the goal(s).  Elections will not remove Yahya because he’s the referee. A coup and/or civil disobedience may or may not happen but if it does, could remove Yahya. Removing Yahya is considered first step towards democratization but what if that successor turn brutal or you hope s/he will not do that. Well Yahya proclaimed “soldiers with a difference” and decade later he is one of Africa’s brutal dictators who discarded friends that helped him at coup and amassed personal wealth at the expense of Gambia. A diaspora group(s) would have important roles but can’t practically be the National Face. The organizational development of this struggle is almost important as the goal of the struggle. It’s the vehicle and has to be appropriate to carry the load. The ongoing rhetorical calls to unity or finding common ground are premature; it ought to be called to come together to assembly a working team to develop a concept cause on the promises of our founding. Our challenge is to ultimately develop ‘A National Democracy Vision’ that can be sold to Gambia and the international community.

The main disadvantages of a political process are – is not straight line (we need understand fluid politics at all levels), it will consume time, will be expensive and we might have give in to something to achieve the ultimate price.

Fellow Gambians lets wage a deserved battle! Lets sought for the right tools to wage an effective battle! Lets keep our eye on the ultimate price! Lets not give in certain core fundamentals no matter how hard the going maybe.

I’m neither against anyone nor am I against any effort – but we have to challenge our own self every day on everything otherwise cynicism prevails at attempts of constructive engagement. Be self inform that not every act has a value for the ultimate price.

To conclude here is what George W Bush told America on September 14, 2001, at The National Cathedral, Washington DC – “just three days removed from these events, Americans do not yet have the distance of history. But our responsibility to history is already clear; to answer these attacks and rid the world of evil. War has been waged against us by stealth and deceit and murder. This nation is peaceful, but fierce when stirred to anger. The conflict was begun on the timing and terms of others. It will end in a way, and at an hour, of our choosing”

Take America out and replace it with Gambia. See the evil as Yahya and our people fierce when stirred. With the gutsy GW Bush resolve and wisdom…why can’t we take out Yahya?

Let’s make Gambia ‘A Functioning Institutional Democracy’ – the optimal way to end dictatorship!



November 20, 2014
Reads :771
Jammeh, a shining start among African leaders? African leaders should kill themselves wo!!!

Jammeh in white is the shining star among African leaders? African leaders should kill themselves wo!!! This is real agony and it’s just part One!!!

By Mr. Kombassere Tinga

Dear Editor: I have been following your newspaper for a very long time now and many others as well. I have lived in Gambia both before and after Jammeh’s coup and would be grateful if you can give me the chance to share my honest feelings in your highly respected medium. This letter/opinion piece is the beginning of a long document I want to share regularly on Kibaaro if you will be democratic enough to entertain my independent thoughts.

In the aftermath of the decolonisation movement, West-Africa was plagued by instability during most of the second half of the twentieth century; for instance, Liberia and Sierra Leone suffered long and gruesome civil wars. Barely a decade into the current one, that similar atrocities were again witnessed this time in the Ivory Coast albeit in comparatively smaller scale than in the two cases named above. The latest challenge to stability in the region emerged only a few months ago in the form of the deadly Ebola virus that has already claimed scores of lives. In contrast to this dire picture, the “tiny” country of The Gambia cuts a spot of shiny light that has escaped all of  the aforementioned disasters.

The Gambia has not been spared because it is immune from globalisation nor is it correct to assume that Gambians don’t see their World through lenses of development aspirations or human rights ideals. In fact, The Gambia could have easily succumbed to political instability when Jahya Jammeh seized power in a bloodless coup on 22 July, 1994. Few coups were carried out so smoothly on the continent at the time ; what ensued has been a  long period of stability and steady economic development..

President Jammeh’s detractors often misrepresent him as a dictator yet they fail to mention his tremendous achievements hitherto and the many more qualitative changes he has brought to the lives of those who need it the most; ordinary Gambians.

Roads, schools, hospitals, electricity, and other infrastructures have been and will be at Gambians’ disposal under the leadership of Professor Alhaji Dr. Yahya A JJ Jammeh, Babili Mansa.

 Jammeh is sometimes attacked over  some of his deliberately provocative public declarations on issues such as human rights, homosexuality, and democracy. On close look however, it is quite clear that Professor Jammeh thrives to uphold the secular values that Gambian society developed and cherished over several millennia before colonialism. President Jammeh has ruled and ensured stability over two decades while his opposition both within and in Western capitals have failed to propose better and workable alternative policies that will enhance the living conditions of their compatriots. Most Gambian opposition leaders or activists fail to ask a very basic question, “what are the values that I have learnt abroad that meet the needs of my own culture”?

Philosophical debates about concepts such as democracy or human rights cannot be conducted in a vacuum, they need to be carried out from a foundation of cultural pillars. All humans aspire to freedom to speak, eat, learn and shelter themselves in accordance with their individual and collective conscience; nothing can be more universal but a uniformed World functioning according to the whims of those who not so long ago blessed slavery and colonialism is just what we cannot wish for ourselves.

The real issue with Gambian opposition is that its members despise Jammeh as a man but who is that man then?

Behind the outspoken and overtly Quran carrying figure, is a man deeply in tune with his ancestry and the modern World of Facebook , Twitter and YouTube. Prof Jammeh is not afraid to remind other Africans who they are and what they have been subjected to at the hands of those who now preach democracy and human rights. This devout Muslim is tough when it needs to be but also affords clemency and genuine candour towards other people. His leadership may not please everybody but the tangible results achieved since the departure of Dawda Jawara are there for all to see. In Africa it is often said that there are only three types of leaders; some stand in front of their people, some immerse in the people while others stay right behind their people. The first type is the adventurer unaware of the people’s aspirations and preoccupied by self grandeur. The second is so wrapped in daily routine that all important events pass them by; as for the third, they stand behind the people to observe, analyse then act on the aspirations and beyond. Jammeh is very much of the last type hence his longevity in power.